论文部分内容阅读
行政诉讼法明确规定,被告对具体行政行为承担举证责任,但这并不意味着原告在行政诉讼中就不承担任何举证责任。在某些特定的情况下,原告亦应承担举证责任。一、原告承担推进举证责任原告是行政诉讼的启动者,因此,原告应当承担推进举证责任。由于行政案件的种类不同,原告承担推进举证责任的具体内容亦有所区别。(一)一般案件起诉人应当提供符合起诉条件的相应的证据材料。行政诉讼法第四十一条规定:“提起诉讼应当符合下列条件:(一)原告是认为具体行政行为侵犯其合法权益的公民、法人或者组织;(二)有明确的被告;(三)有具体的诉
Administrative procedural law clearly stipulates that the defendant to bear the burden of proof of specific administrative acts, but this does not mean that the plaintiff in the administrative proceedings will not assume any burden of proof. In some specific cases, the plaintiff should also bear the burden of proof. First, the plaintiff to promote the burden of proof The plaintiff is the initiator of administrative proceedings, therefore, the plaintiff should bear the burden of promoting evidence. Due to the different types of administrative cases, the plaintiffs bear the burden of promoting the specific contents of the burden of proof are also different. (A) The general case The prosecutor should provide the corresponding evidence of prosecution conditions. Article 41 of the Code of Administrative Procedures stipulates that: ”The litigation shall meet the following conditions: (1) The plaintiff is a citizen, legal person or organization that considers that a specific administrative act infringes upon his legitimate rights and interests; (2) Has a clear defendant; (3) Have a specific complaint