论文部分内容阅读
(接上期)三、商标异议实务经验谈之程序篇2013年修改的商标法实施前,商标异议主体没有限制,即“任何人”都可以提起异议。但该方式导致了实践中出现了一些问题:部分主体无视异议本身可否成立,将异议作为一种竞争手段,恶意延缓他人商标注册;甚至利用异议来要挟他人,获取不正当利益。鉴于此,修改后的商标法区分了商标可注册性的相对理由和绝对理由,对异议人的主体资格进行了限制。具体而言,依据商标法第十三
(Continued) III. Procedures for Talking About Trademark Opposition Practice Experience Prior to the implementation of the Trademark Law amended in 2013, there was no limit to the subject of trademark opposition, that is, “anyone” could raise an objection. However, this method has led to some problems in practice: some of the subjects disregard the possibility of the objection itself being established, using opposition as a means of competition, maliciously delaying the registration of others’ marks, and even using opposition to threaten others and gain improper benefits. In view of this, the amended Trademark Law distinguishes the relative grounds and absolute grounds of the registrability of trademarks and restricts the qualification of the opponent as the main body. Specifically, according to the thirteenth trademark law