我国国内民商事仲裁撤销事由的范围,与域外立法相比,实体性事项规定得较多,程序性事由涵盖过窄;实践中,作为当事人申请撤销仲裁的理由中,实体性事项被选择的过多,相应的司法审查也难以产生良性效果;理论上,保障公正、维护仲裁、接轨国际等原则的共同指向一个逻辑结果;具体事由的设置上,也存在一些问题。 Compared with the legislation on extraterritoriality, there are more substantive matters and procedural matters are too narrow in scope of the grounds for the withdrawal of civil and commercial arbitration in our country. In practice, as the reasons for the parties to apply for revocation of arbitration, substantive matters have been selected In theory, the principles of safeguarding fairness, safeguarding arbitration, and integrating international principles all point to a logical result. There are also some problems in the setting of specific reasons.