论文部分内容阅读
租赁合同因交易专用性财产价值很大而无法自我调节时,有必要通过适当的规制结构加以辅助,使得承租人利益得到保障。其他国家和地区的城市更新通常采取安置承租人或者明确承租人对出租人损失补偿请求权的保障模式。在我国既无法律明文规定,政府机构又对非村民利益无力顾及的情况下,明确承租人损失补偿的请求权基础,使之可以通过司法途径实现权利救济是现实路径。基于后合同义务的损害赔偿请求权、代偿请求权、不当得利请求权三条路径可以作为承租人损失补偿的请求权基础,请求权的选择需依个案确定。
When the lease contract can not be adjusted by the value of the transaction-specific property, it is necessary to be supplemented by an appropriate regulatory structure so that the interests of the lessee are protected. Urban renewal in other countries and regions usually adopts the mode of guaranteeing the right of the lessor to compensate the lessor for the resettlement lessee or the definite lessee. In our country, there is neither legal norms, government agencies and non-villagers can not take into account the interests of the case, a clear definition of lessee compensation claim basis, so that it can be achieved through judicial access to rights relief is a realistic path. The three paths of claim for damages, compensatory claims and unjust enrichment claims based on post-contractual obligations can be used as the basis of the right of claim for compensation for losses of lessee, and the choice of claim should be determined on a case-by-case basis.