关于１９４９年以后的当代文学能否写史的问题一直是学术界争论的焦点之一。一种意见从强调文学稳定性、历史性、独立性的角度着眼，认为不宜写史。一种意见则以文学的阶段性、归纳性、研究性的角度着眼，认为可以写史。我们认为，任何一种文学都是处在一种发展变化的历史形态 The question of whether or not the contemporary literature can be written after 1949 has always been one of the focal points in academic circles. One opinion from the perspective of emphasizing literary stability, historicity and independence thinks that it is inappropriate to write history. One opinion focuses on the stage of literature, inductive and research, and thinks that it is possible to write history. We think that any kind of literature is in a historical form of development and change