论文部分内容阅读
20世纪90年代初,“文革”文学作为一个“话题”历史性地引发了学界的讨论。在“地下文学”与“地上文学”的认知碰撞中,个体话语与集体话语的存在形态成了“文革”文学价值研究的一重要表征,但历史地看待“文革”的主流文学,其主体性的失落虽然是“文革”政治权力话语的必然结果,但它承载的却是“文革”时期“人”的一种生命存在形态,在今天看来同样具有“整体性文学史观”的价值和意义。
In the early 1990s, “Cultural Revolution” literature as a “topic ” historically triggered discussions in academia. In the collision of cognition between “underground literature ” and “ground literature ”, the existence form of individual discourse and collective discourse has become an important characterization of “Cultural Revolution” literary value study, but historically viewed “Cultural Revolution Although the loss of its subjectivity is an inevitable result of the ”Cultural Revolution“ political power discourse, it carries a kind of life existence in the period of ”Cultural Revolution“ and ”people“ Today it also seems to have the value and significance of the ”holistic view of history of literature".