1936年的“两个口号”之争是近代学术界的一个重要事件,它表明了左翼文学界在理论与运动中的本质分歧。长久以来,人们较为关注鲁迅、周扬、茅盾等人在这场论战中的基本观点,而忽略了该事件所涉及的关于马克思主义中国化深层问题。陈伯达的文章不但在形式上结束了论战,而且从马克思主义方法论的层面上就论战中的基本纠纷进行了有效的调解,特别是他对形式与内容、普遍性与特殊性、口号与实效的辩证关系的权衡对当代马克思主义中国化仍然具有极大的启发。 The controversy between the two slogans of 1936, an important event in modern academic circles, shows the essential differences between theory and movement in the left-wing literary circles. For a long time, people have paid more attention to the basic views of Lu Xun, Zhou Yang and Mao Dun in this controversy, while ignoring the deep-seated problems concerning the localization of Marxism in that incident. Chen Boda’s article not only formally ended the controversy but also effectively mediated the basic disputes in the debate from the Marxist methodological level, especially his dialectic of form and content, universality and particularity, slogans and effectiveness The trade-off of relations still has great inspiration for the contemporary Chinese-Marxism.