论文部分内容阅读
相关市场界定是反垄断诉讼中至关重要的问题。对我国法院反垄断诉讼裁判文书的分析研究表明,相关市场界定中将需求替代分析作为相关市场界定的最主要方法,产品市场与地域市场受到同等程度重视,将相关市场作为一种事实对待,原告的证明责任较重,对于相关市场界定的重视程度不高,质量还有待提升,说理不足与论证充分现象并存。规范反垄断诉讼中相关市场的界定,本文认为应当提高对相关市场界定的重视程度,完善相关市场的界定方法,合理配置当事人的证明责任。
Relevant market definition is a crucial issue in antitrust litigation. The analysis and research on China’s court antitrust litigation verdict instruments shows that the relevant market defines the most important method of defining the relevant market as the most important method to define the relevant market. The product market and the regional market are equally valued, and the relevant market is treated as a fact. The plaintiff The burden of proof is heavy, and the degree of attention paid to the definition of the relevant market is not high, the quality needs to be improved, and the lack of reasoning and the phenomenon of sufficient argumentation exist side by side. In order to standardize the definition of the relevant market in antitrust litigation, this paper argues that we should increase the emphasis on the definition of the relevant market, improve the methods of defining the relevant market, and rationally allocate the parties’ burden of proof.