回首人文社会科学在二十世纪的发展历程,可以发现各学科研究视域的“小大之辩”一直是一个学者聚讼不已的问题。是致力于勾勒总体性的宏大叙事,以开放的比较视野直探人类历史时空的变迁规律与普遍模式,还是聚焦微观与分殊,不避“碎片化”之讥,以深描人文世界的具体情态和多样生机为己任?研究视域的抉择,不仅是研究者个人心境与愿景的折射,更关 Looking back on the course of the development of the humanities and social sciences in the 20th century, it can be found that “the debate of minorities” in the field of study of various disciplines has always been a matter of endless scholarship. Is devoted to outline the general grand narrative, with a comparatively open field of vision to probe directly into the changing laws and universal patterns of human history in time and space, or to focus on the micro and the distinctions without dwelling on the “fragmentation” to deeply trace the humanistic world Specific modalities and diverse vitals as their own responsibility? The study of choice, not only reflects the individual mood and vision of the researcher,