在基金项目评审中比较普遍采用的方法之一是同行通讯评审,即由同行专家背靠背地对申请项目进行评审。对于同行通讯评审,国内外已研究和运用了多年,其内在优势已为人们普遍承认,即,它可以充分利用科学共同体中的科学家来实现科技资源的合理配置,有助于科学决策的民主化,并杜绝单 One of the more commonly used methods in the evaluation of fund projects is peer communications review, in which peer experts review application projects back to back. For the peer communications review, both at home and abroad have been studied and used for many years, its inherent advantages have been widely recognized that it can make full use of scientific community scientists to achieve the rational allocation of scientific and technological resources, contribute to the democratization of scientific decision-making , And eliminate single