论文部分内容阅读
目的了解濮阳市常规免疫接种率监测现状,分析2015年接种率监测结果 ,发现存在的问题并提出改进意见。方法用Excel软件处理数据,对比8种基础疫苗的估算接种率和报告接种率,并进行差值(D)和比值(R)的指标评价。结果全市8个县(区)接种率报告及时率为87.50%、完整率为100.00%、正确率为100.00%;D值评价:全市总体评价为OV可信,HBV、DPT、MCV、JEV可疑,BCG、MenA、HepA不可信。8个县(区)64个指标评价为可信的6个(9.38%),可疑的24个(37.50%),不可信的34个(53.12%);R值评价:8个县(区)评价为2个可信,6个可疑,全市总体评价为可疑。结论濮阳市常规免疫监测报告数据真实性不高,并且可能存在逻辑性错误,接种率监测数据质量还需要进一步提高。
Objective To understand the status quo of routine immunization surveillance in Puyang City, analyze the 2015 vaccination rate monitoring results, find out the existing problems and put forward some suggestions for improvement. Methods The software was used to process the data. The estimated vaccination rates and reported inoculation rates of 8 kinds of basic vaccines were compared. The difference (D) and ratio (R) were evaluated. Results The inpatient coverage rate was 87.50% and the complete rate was 100.00% in 8 counties (districts) in the city with a correct rate of 100.00%. The evaluation of D value: The overall evaluation of the city was credible, HBV, DPT, MCV and JEV were suspicious, BCG, MenA, HepA not trustworthy. Six of the eight counties (districts) were evaluated as trustworthy (9.38%), suspicious (37.50%) and untrustworthy (53.12%). R Evaluation: 8 counties Evaluation of 2 credible, 6 suspicious, the city’s overall rating as suspicious. Conclusion The data of routine immunization monitoring in Puyang City is not highly authentic, and there may be logic errors. The quality of inoculation rate monitoring data needs to be further improved.