由于法律具有相对稳定性和滞后性,在面对社会生活的高速变化性时,难免会出现一些案件在现行法律规定中找不到裁判的依据。但“禁止拒绝裁判”原则要求法官不得以法律没有规定而拒绝裁判,类推适用在法律漏洞补充中起着非常重要的作用。本文以“泥人张”商标纠纷案为例来浅析一下类推适用的漏洞补充功能。 Due to the relative stability and lag of the law, in the face of the rapid changes in social life, it is inevitable that some cases can not find the basis of referee in the existing laws and regulations. However, the principle of “refusing to judge a judge” requires that a judge refuse to judge the judge without the stipulation of law, and the application of analogy plays a very important role in the supplement of legal loopholes. This article takes the case of the trademark dispute of “Clay Man Zhang” as an example to analyze the supplementary functions of the applicable analogy.