论文部分内容阅读
从生态视角看,比较文学和比较美学历史地形成了四大学术范式。影响研究在影响者和接受者的对生中,达成微观比较,达成前者对后者的同化,达成双方同构,形成了同生范式。平行研究在文学与文学、文学与艺术、文学与科学、文学与文化的双向对生中,形成中观比较,形成文明发展的共同规律,显示出共生范式。整体研究在世界文学、世界美学、世界文化、世界文明的背景下,展开各种整观比较,以大观小、以小见大,构成了一生范式。总体研究整合所有整体研究,在以万生一、以一生万、万万一生、一一旋生中,形成统观比较,形成文学、美学、文化、文明耦合并进的超循环规律,形成整生范式。这就显示了学科疆域的整体拓进与审美规律的系统发展。
From the ecological point of view, comparative literature and comparative aesthetics history form four academic paradigms. Impact study in the perpetrators and recipients of the students, to reach a micro-comparison, to achieve the former assimilation of the latter, to achieve both isomorphism, formed the same-birth paradigm. The parallel study forms a common law of development of civilizations through comparison of two aspects of literature and literature, literature and art, literature and science, literature and culture, and shows the paradigm of symbiosis. In the context of world literature, world aesthetics, world culture and world civilization, the overall study has launched various kinds of comparison between the whole world and the whole world. The overall study integrates all the holistic researches and forms a universal comparison of the concepts of universal life, lifetimes, lifelong life and revival of life, forming a super-cycle law of the combination of literature, aesthetics, culture and civilization, Health paradigm. This shows the systematic extension of the territory of the whole discipline and the aesthetic law.