论文部分内容阅读
文学制度问题是近年来理论界热议的话题。托尼·本尼特把体裁作为制度提供了一个不同的研究视角。他认为马克思主义体裁社会学的分析逻辑并不能从根本上分析清楚文学的形式与功能、文学与社会之间的关系问题,由此他提出把体裁作为制度的替代分析方法。体裁制度的分析逻辑把体裁看成“互—文性”的社会/关系场域,它注重体裁对于促成主体构形、调节写作生产与阅读实践方面的功能。经过研究发现,体裁制度其实是略去体裁的形式本身而专注于体裁的功能如何有效实现的问题。从根本上来说,就是使体裁发挥对个体的效用功能,这个效用归根结底是通过文学的阅读构形作用,实现个体在阅读、理解、价值判断以至于人的精神方面的自由。
The issue of literary system is a heated topic in theorists in recent years. Tony Bennett offers a different perspective on the genre as a system. In his opinion, the analysis logic of the Marxist sociology of genre does not fundamentally analyze the relationship between the form and function of literature, literature and society. Therefore, he proposes to use genre as an alternative analysis method to the system. The logic of the analysis of the genre system regards the genre as the social / relational field of “mutual-lyricism”, which pays attention to the function of the genre in promoting the formation of the subject, regulating the production of the writing and the practice of reading. After the study found that the genre system is actually omitting the formal form of the genre itself and focusing on how the function of the genre can be effectively implemented. Fundamentally speaking, the genre is to make the genre play a utility function to the individual. This function is ultimately to realize the individual’s freedom in reading, understanding, value judgment and human spirit through the composition of the reading of literature.