这种情况恐怕不是个别的——无论是同事,还是领导,更不用说学生及其家长了,明明都觉得某老师优秀,可放在“客观公正”的“硬条件”面前,他却“优秀”不起来。相反,另一位大家都认为“很一般”的老师却能通过同样的条件“一枝独秀”。这是些什么“硬条件”呢?其实很简单,就是各级荣誉称号、各类获奖证书,包括发表的文章,等等。有时候,两位旗鼓相当的候选人如果PK到最后,甚至连诸如多一面“班级卫生流动红旗”都会成为“压死”对手的“最后一根稻草”。 I am afraid that this situation is not individual - whether colleagues or leaders, not to mention students and their parents, obviously all think a teacher is good and can be placed “objective and fair” “hard conditions” before, He is “good ” can not be together. On the other hand, another teacher who thinks “very average” passes the same criteria. What is this “hard condition”? In fact, very simple, is the honorary title of all levels, all kinds of award-winning certificates, including published articles, and so on. Sometimes, two well-matched candidates will eventually even become “the last straw” of a “crushed” opponent if the PK ends up.