论文部分内容阅读
在情报理论和情报工作中存在着不少模糊不清的问题,这些问题大都涉及对情报与资料、情报工作与资料工作这一基本问题的理解。综合起来,有三种不同意见。第一是“等于论”。认为图书馆学和科技情报学实际上是一家。第二是“大于论”。认为情报工作的范畴大于文献工作,情报工作可以包括文献工作,而后者不能包括前者。第三是“质异论”。认为情报和资料是两个截然不同的概念,情报工作和资料工作是两个关系十分密切,但性质又有区别的工作。资料是静的,情报是动的;资料是条件,情报不是条件;资料是客观的,情报具
There are many ambiguities in the intelligence theory and intelligence work. Most of these issues involve the understanding of the basic issues of intelligence and information, intelligence work and information work. Taken together, there are three different opinions. The first is “equal to theory.” Think library science and science and information science is actually one. The second is “greater than theory.” They think that the scope of intelligence work is greater than that of literature work. Information work can include literature work, while the latter can not include the former. The third is “qualitative difference.” Think of intelligence and information as two very different concepts. Intelligence and information work are two very closely related but different in nature. Information is static, intelligence is moving; information is a condition, intelligence is not a condition; data is objective, intelligence