学术界对“五四”新文化运动本身的历史发展过程有前、后期的划分,同样,对于陈独秀个人在这一运动期间的思想状况,也大都认为前后有所变化,只是人们对于所谓前、后期的界定意见不尽相同。笔者认为,作为具体的政治历史事件的“五四爱国运动”最足以构成新文化运动前、后期的分水岭,因为从这一事件开始,新文化运动事实上从比较广义的文化运动的范围中发生某种突破,其中的一部分逐渐而明显地带有了政治运动的性质。而从陈独秀的情况来看,他在“五四爱国运动”的高潮中意外被捕,正与上述演变相吻合,另外,他在获释后的社会活动,更是鲜明地转向实际的政治活动方面,至于这阶段的 In the same way, most scholars think that Chen Duxiu’s personal ideological status during this campaign has changed before and after, but only because people are not familiar with the so-called “ Late definition of different opinions. The author believes that the ”May 4th Patriotic Movement“ as a concrete political and historical event is the most adequate watershed for the pre- and post-New Culture Movement since the New Culture Movement actually took place in the broader context of cultural movements from this incident Some breakthrough, some of which gradually and apparently brought the nature of political movements. From the perspective of Chen Duxiu’s situation, his accidental arrest at the climax of the ”May Fourth Patriotic Campaign" is coinciding with the above evolution. In addition, his social activities after his release are clearly turning to the actual political activities As for this stage