论文部分内容阅读
人文社会科学类学术期刊在审稿专家遴选的过程中存在很大的主观性,大同行现象严重,这样的专家队伍对论文很难作出准确的评价。作者同被引分析法(ACA法)为准确判断哪些专家是真正的同行提供了可能性。本文利用这一方法并借助信息可视化技术,对《科学学与科学技术管理》的审稿专家进行了验证,证明了人文社会科学类学术期刊可以凭借这一方法建立高效的审稿专家队伍。最后指出了该方法的局限性。
Academic journals of the humanities and social sciences have great subjectivity in the process of selection of reviewers, and serious problems exist in their counterparts. Such a team of experts can hardly make accurate comments on theses. The authors, along with the Citation Analysis Method (ACA), offer the possibility to accurately determine which experts are real peers. This article uses this method and information visualization technology to validate the reviewer of “Science and Management of Science and Technology”, and proves that the humanities and social sciences academic journals can establish an efficient contingent of reviewers with this method. Finally, the limitations of this method are pointed out.