论文部分内容阅读
一、对《激情燃烧的岁月》迟到的批判《激情燃烧的岁月》是去年最热的电视剧。激情烧过之后,一些理论工作者开始对“激情”进行反思。段大明以《激情、煽情、悲情、矫情》为标题,对该电视剧提出批评:利用观众的怀旧情绪来煽情,让男性观众过足了一把“男人瘾”、“家长瘾”,也让女性观众重温了一遍“豆蔻年华”、“青春似火”的美好岁月。然而煽起来的情是不是真情,是不是值得肯定的爱情,恐怕得打个问号。这些误区表现在:农民意识的固守与对城市文明的拒绝。
First, the “passion burning years” late criticism “passion burning years” is the hottest TV show last year. After the passion has been burned, some theorists begin to reflect on “passion.” Duan Ming “passion, sensationalism, sadness, hypocritical” as the title, criticized the drama: the audience’s nostalgia to sensational, so that the male audience had enough of a “man addiction”, “addicted to parents,” but also for women The audience revisits it again, “Cardamon Love”, “youthful” good years. However, fanned love is not the truth, is not a sure love, I am afraid to be asked a question mark. These misunderstandings are manifested in: peasants’ conscientiousness and refusal to urban civilization.