论文部分内容阅读
《中学语文》今年第二期刊登的《对〈中学文言文通假字百例〉的意见》,就《百例》中部分所渭通假字提出了质疑,并简要地谈了通假字与异体字、繁简字及古今字的区别。我们认为,这个问题提得好!它有助于读者对通假字这一概念的正确理解,划清通假字与古今字、异体字等的界限。目前,有不少公开出版或内部发行的“语文复习资料”和语文刊物刊登的《百例》之娄。对通假字的既念使用的情况是相当混乱的。这些资料和文章,很喜欢用一
The “Opinions on the 100 Cases of Classical Chinese in the Classical Chinese” published in the second edition of this year’s “Chinese Language for Middle Schools” raises questions about the use of false characters in the “100 Cases” and briefly discusses the use of fake words and variants. The difference between simple characters and ancient and modern characters. We believe that this issue is a good one! It helps the reader to correctly understand the concept of the false-password, and draws a clear distinction between the false-going words and the ancient and modern words and variant words. At present, there are quite a few “publications of language review” published in or published internally and “100 cases” published in language publications. It is quite confusing to use the words that are used to read the fake characters. These materials and articles are very like using one