论文部分内容阅读
目的设计手部动作灵活性的纸笔测验并对其进行信、效度检验。方法以测量手部动作灵活性为目的设计纸笔测验,该测验包括测验专用纸和2支固定了不同直径的圆规,测验方式是要求被试者在测验纸的线框内画圆,画圆时只能用一只手,依次轮换两个圆规。共对712名被试者施测动作灵活性纸笔测验。为进行效度研究,同时对所有被试者施测武警用多项能力倾向测验,对46名被试者做手指灵活性的拧螺丝板仪器测验,还收集了一个中队全部37名被试者的训练成绩。取45名被试者间隔23 d重测动作灵活性纸笔测验做信度研究。结果被试者在动作灵活性纸笔测验的得分与武警多项能力倾向测验各分测验得分的相关系数在0.04~0.35,与训练成绩的相关系数为0.40,与拧螺丝板仪器测验得分的相关系数为0.48;重测信度为0.57。结论动作灵活性纸笔测验效度达到同类测验的水平,且简单易行,可作为动作灵活性的团体测量工具。
Objective To design a pen and paper test for the flexibility of hand movement and test its validity and reliability. Methods The paper pen test was designed to measure the flexibility of hand movement. The test consisted of test paper and two compasses with different diameters fixed. The test mode required the subjects to draw a circle in the wire frame of the test paper and draw a circle Can only use one hand, turn two compasses in turn. A total of 712 subjects were instructed to exercise flexibility paper pen test. In order to carry out the validity study, at the same time, all subjects were instructed to test the armed police with multiple ability tests, and 46 subjects were tested for finger flexibility by screwing board instruments. A total of 37 squadrons were also collected The training results. Take 45 subjects interval 23 d retest action flexibility paper pen test to do reliability study. Results The correlation between the scores of pen and paper test and the scores of each sub-test of the Armed Police Force aptitude test ranged from 0.04 to 0.35, and the correlation coefficient with training scores was 0.40, which was related to the screw-screw test instrument score The coefficient is 0.48; the test-retest reliability is 0.57. Conclusion Action flexibility Paper pen test validity to the level of similar tests, and simple, can be used as a measure of mobility group measurement tools.