笔者认为,弃权后“另选他人”与“不能另选”两种情况都不违法,都可以合理存在,实际操作中以弃权后不能另选他人为主。仔细体会组织法和选举法的释义,笔者认为,法律仅规定了弃权是指投票人没有对候选人表示赞同或者反对意见的一种行为,并没有对“弃权后是否可另选他人”做具体、细化的说明。因此关于弃权后是否可以另选 The author believes that after abstaining, “other people” and “can not be elected” are not illegal in both cases, and all of them can be justified. In practice, they can not choose others after abstention. Carefully understand the constitutional and electoral law interpretation, the author believes that the law only provides for abstaining refers to the voter did not agree or disagree with the candidates a kind of act, and not “whether to elect others after abstention” To do specific, detailed description. So on the other can be alternative after the abstention