论文部分内容阅读
北京市自2011年1月起实行车辆摇号限购政策。2014年1月起指标配置周期改为每两月一次,“一号难求”的局面愈演愈烈。因此,车辆限购政策下的相关法律纠纷层出不穷,笔者在此以几个典型案例为引,为广大读者深入分析其中的法律问题。利用法院过户法律说不案例一:2012年7月11日,北京的赵某与刘某签订了买车协议,协议就车辆的型号、价格、双方的权利义务以及协议生效时间进行了约定。协议签订
Beijing Municipality since January 2011 the implementation of the purchase of vehicles Yaohao policy. Since January 2014, the indicator configuration cycle has been changed to every two months, and the situation of “No.1 hard to find” intensified. Therefore, the vehicle purchase policy under the law related to an endless stream of endless disputes, the author here to take a few typical cases as a guide for our readers in-depth analysis of the legal issues. Court case that the use of transfer law is not a Case 1: July 11, 2012, Zhao Mou and Beijing signed a car purchase agreement, the agreement on the model of the vehicle, the rights and obligations of both parties and the effective time of the agreement. Agreement signed