论文部分内容阅读
编辑同志： 我行于１９９９年５月为Ａ公司承兑一张商业汇票，该汇票到期日为１９９９年１０月２５日。此后，该票据几经背书转让，在背书栏内均未注明背书日期。２００１年８月，被背书人Ｄ公司持该票来我行磋商票据付款事宜，因Ｄ公司不愿说明其在票据到期日后提示付款的理由，我行未同意付款。２００１年 １０月，Ｅ银行来我行提示付款，并说明票据系从Ｄ公司背书转让取得。我行认为，该票据早已超过提示付款日，仍在流通转让，且众所周知出票人已于一年前无力偿付其对外债务，持票人是否善意受让票据存在疑问，故不宜贸然付款。Ｅ银行遂起诉我行。 请问，在本案中我行对Ｅ银行的付款请求有无抗辩权？
Editorial Comrade: Our bank accepted a commercial draft for Company A in May 1999, and the expiry date of the draft is October 25, 1999. Since then, the instrument after several endorsement transfer, no endorsement column in the endorsement date. In August 2001, D was endorsed by the company to negotiate with us to negotiate the bill payment matters, D Company is unwilling to explain why it prompts payment after the maturity of the bill, our bank did not agree to pay. October 2001, E Bank to our bank prompt payment, and notes the Department of the company obtained from the D endorsement transfer. The Bank believes that the note has already exceeded the prompt payment date and is still in circulation and transfer. It is well known that the drawer had been unable to pay its external debt a year ago and that the bearer was doubtful about the acceptance of the negotiable instrument. Bank E sued me. Excuse me, in this case, my bank has no right of defense against the payment request of Bank E?