论文部分内容阅读
自1993年至今我们通过对160例患者实行改良式子宫下段剖宫产,与160例传统子宫下段剖宫产进行比较,术后出血、伤口愈合及感染情况无明显差异且有手术时间短、减少病人精神及经济负担等作用,现介绍如下:1、临床资料1·1 一般情况:本文160例改良式子宫下段剖宫产年龄20～40岁,初产妇128例,经产妇32例,再次剖宫产35例,臀位42例,横位2例,胎膜早破69例,第二产程延长13例,胎儿宫内窘迫21例,胎儿巨大18例,随机抽样93年至今160例传统式子宫下段剖宫产,年龄25～35岁,初产妇135例,经产妇25例,再次剖宫产28例,臀位63例,胎膜早破50例,第二产程延长10例,胎儿宫内窘迫30例,巨大胎儿29例。
Since 1993, we have adopted 160 cases of improved inferior uterine segment cesarean section, compared with 160 cases of traditional uterine segment lower uterine segment, postoperative bleeding, wound healing and infection were no significant differences in the operation time and reduce the short The patient’s mental and economic burden and other functions, are described below: 1, clinical data 1.1 General: 160 cases of improved uterine segment of the lower part of the caesarean section aged 20 to 40 years, 128 cases of primipara, maternal 32 cases, again profile Palace in 35 cases, 42 cases of breech, horizontal in 2 cases, 69 cases of premature rupture of membranes, the second stage of labor extended to 13 cases, fetal distress in 21 cases, 18 cases of fetal huge, random sampling from 1993 to the present 160 cases of traditional Lower uterine segment of the cesarean section, aged 25 to 35 years, 135 cases of primipara, 25 cases of maternal, cesarean section again in 28 cases, 63 cases of breech, premature rupture of membranes in 50 cases, 10 cases of extension of the second stage, fetus 30 cases of internal distress, 29 cases of huge fetus.