文天祥乃抗元英雄,后世对其忠推崇有加。但明清之际,王夫之于《宋论》中批判文氏,认为其轻信女主,出使元营,忠诚得过了头。王夫之对文氏的批判展现了遗民史家独特的历史与文化背景。由于未全面考虑实情,王夫之对文氏的批判有诸多不当之处。王夫之两部史论著作是中国史学史上的经典,但王夫之在评判文氏时与其主张之治史原则却有所出入。史学评论需具备“了解之同情”的态度,不宜苛求。 Wen Tianxiang is anti-Yuan hero, later on its loyalty respected plus. However, on the occasion of the Ming and Qing dynasties, Wang Fuzhi criticized Wen in the Song Theory, believing that she belittled her mistress, excused the woman and loyalists. Wang Fuzhi’s criticism of Wen’s history shows the unique historical and cultural background of the descendants. Due to incomplete consideration of the facts, Wang Fuzhi’s criticism of Wen’s has many defects. Wang Fuzhi’s two monographs on history are a classic in the history of Chinese history, but Wang Fuzhi’s discrepancy in his judgment on the history of Wenzhi was different from that advocated by Wang Fuzhi. Historical reviews need to have the “sympathy for understanding” attitude, not demanding.