十多年前,丹晨写了一本《巴金评传》,如果不是我孤陋寡闻的话,抛开国外汉学家的有关著述不论,这大约是国内学者自己撰写的第一部系统地研究巴金生平与创作的专著。因其第一,他的开掘意义自然就不容忽视;同样是因其第一,或许他在某些部分的粗疏以及个别史实的出入也就容易为人所忽略、所原谅。时光过去了十余年,丹晨又写出了另一本近乎《巴金评传》的新著:《巴金的 Ten years ago, Dan Chen wrote a book entitled “Critique of Ba Jin”, if it is not my ignorance, aside from the foreign sinologists, regardless of the writings, which is about the domestic scholar himself wrote the first systematic study of Ba Jin’s life and creation Monographs. Because of its first, his digging significance naturally can not be ignored; the same is because of its first, perhaps he is in some parts of the coarse and the access of individual historical facts is easy to neglect, forgive. More than a decade later, Danchen wrote another new book, “Critique of Ba Jin”: "Ba Jin’s