我们在任何情况下都应当试一试弄明白:是否存在着能把主客体联合成一个概念结构的哲学?在我研究了物理学之后,马赫的哲学在这方面使我大吃一惊,因此我转向实证论,因为马赫是一位哲学家中的杰出代表.之所以这样使我吃惊,是因为马赫的意图是:如果说感觉是唯一基本的存在,那么就大可不必去理解主、客体.马赫称“感觉”为“要素”.并且他还让人们理解:做为要素的感觉不是主体的感觉,这种感觉是客观的、第一性的.说实在的,我觉得这个理论不够明确.反对这个理论的意见之一是:我们常讲的,能给我们知识的那些事物,如果用哲学语言表达的话(马赫的),这就意味着我们要称那些实际存在为感觉.并且用马赫哲学语言表示的规律——不仅是表示真实感觉之间的联系,而且还常常表示各种可能感觉之间的联系,这样一米就能使我们预测感觉,即经常可以预测可能发生的事情.于是企图弄明白马赫思想的真理性和错误何在的想法,就把我们引到这样的问题:“如何实现上述马赫的可能性的规 In any case, we should try to figure out: Is there a philosophy that can combine subject and object into a conceptual structure? After I studied physics, Mach’s philosophy surprised me in this respect, so I turned to empirical evidence Because Mach was an outstanding representative of a philosopher who surprised me with this because Mach had the intention of saying that if feeling is the only basic existence there is no need to understand the subject and the object, Feeling “as” an element. “And he also lets people understand that the feeling of being an element is not the feeling of the subject, which is objective and first-class, and indeed, I think the theory is not clear enough. : One of the things we often talk about that gives us knowledge, if expressed in philosophical language (Mach), means that we want to call those that are actually being feelings and express them in the language of Mach The law - not only represents the connection between real feelings, but also often shows the relationship between the various possible feelings, so that one meter can make us predict the feeling, that is often predictable . What happened then can attempt to figure out the truth of the ideas and thoughts of what’s wrong Mach, took us to the question: ”How to achieve the above Mach possibility of regulation