论文部分内容阅读
根本违约这一法律概念并不直接推导出法律结果,该制度存在的根本目的在于明确不同违约情形下的不同补救方法。根本违约的构成必须具备主、客观两方面的要件,所谓主观要件是指违约后果的可预见性;所谓客观要件是指违约后果的严重程度。但是实践中对损失严重到何种程度才能构成根本违约的问题很难把握,这就需要结合具体案件中的违约情形及其相关因素,正确把握相关条文之间的链接关系。
The concept of a fundamental breach of contract does not directly derive the legal result. The fundamental purpose of the system is to clarify different remedies under different default situations. The composition of the fundamental breach must possess both the main and the objective elements. The so-called subjective element refers to the predictability of the consequences of the breach of contract. The so-called objective element refers to the severity of the consequences of the breach. However, in practice, it is hard to grasp the extent to which the loss is serious enough to constitute a fundamental breach of contract. This requires a correct grasp of the linkages between the relevant provisions by combining the circumstances of default in specific cases and their related factors.