实证之所以对我们具有一种科学意义,恐怕并不在于它所注重的观察、实验、材料论证以及逻辑分析。因为仅就这些来说,我们的社会科学和自然科学领域并不缺少相应的实践。或者说,我们实际上是一直在强调论点和论证(材料证实与逻辑分析)的相结合作为判别一个命题是否具有科学性和学术性的重要手段。实证之所以在今天被重新提起,很大程度上是在于纠正我们过去是在一种不自觉的状态下将实证作为一种研究方 The reason why the empirical evidence has a scientific significance for us is probably not due to the observation, experiment, material demonstration and logical analysis it focuses on. For these things alone, there is no lack of corresponding practice in our social sciences and natural sciences. In other words, we actually have been emphasizing the combination of argument and argument (material verification and logical analysis) as an important means of determining whether a proposition is scientific or scholarly. The reason why the positivism has been reintroduced today is largely to correct our past as an empirical study in an unconscious state