论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同采血方法进行血常规检验在临床中应用。方法选取我院2015年4月至2016年4月进行血常规检验的人员156例作为研究对象,随机分为A、B、C三组,A组采用动脉采血方法,B组采用静脉采血方法,C组采用末梢采血方法,将三种检测方法所得结果进行对比。结果 C组检测指标WBC、RBC、MCV、Hb、PLT的结果与A、C两组检测结果相比具有显著差异,(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论不同采血方式的血常规检验结果存在差异,静脉采血方式的稳定性及检测结果的准确性均较高,应用价值更广。
Objective To investigate the clinical application of different blood sampling methods in blood tests. Methods 156 cases of blood routine examination in our hospital from April 2015 to April 2016 were selected as the research object and randomly divided into three groups: A, B and C, the arterial blood sampling method in group A, the venous blood sampling method in group B, C group using peripheral blood collection methods, the results of the three detection methods were compared. Results The results of WBC, RBC, MCV, Hb and PLT in group C were significantly different from those in groups A and C (P <0.05), which were statistically significant. Conclusion There are differences in blood routine test results of different blood sampling methods. The stability of venous blood sampling and the accuracy of test results are higher, and the application value is wider.