There are two models in use today to analyze structural responses when subjected to earthquake ground motions,the Displacement Input Model(DIM)and the Acceleration Input Model(AIM).The time steps used in direct integration methods for these models are analyzed to examine the suitability of DIM.Numerical results are presented and show that the time-step for DIM is about the same as for AIM,and achieves the same accuracy.This is contrary to previous research that reported that there are several sources of numerical errors associated with the direct application of earthquake displacement loading,and a very small time step is required to define the displacement record and to integrate the dynamic equilibrium equation.It is shown in this paper that DIM is as accurate and suitable as,ifnot more than,AIM for analyzing the response of a structure to uniformly distributed and spatially varying ground motions. There are two models in use today to analyze structural responses when subjected to earthquake ground motions, the Displacement Input Model (DIM) and the Acceleration Input Model (AIM). The time steps used in direct integration methods for these models are analyzed to examine the suitability of DIM.Numerical results are presented and show that the time-step for DIM is about the same as for AIM, and achieves the same accuracy.This is contrary to previous research that reported that there are several sources of numerical errors associated with the direct application of earthquake displacement loading, and a very small time step is required to define the displacement record and to integrate the dynamic equilibrium equation. It is shown in this paper that DIM is as accurate and suitable as, ifnot more than, AIM for analyzing the response of a structure to uniformly distributed and spatially varying ground motions.