论文部分内容阅读
這幾個碑文是記載清初至鴉片戰爭前夕,蘇州手工業行會的情况。其中包括了臘燭業、金箔業、造紙業、漆作業數家公所的資料。這批材料對於研究清代手工業行會的性質提供了重要的綫索。清代手工業行會究竟是什麼性質呢?這個問題的解答,對於中國資本主義萌芽分期問題的研究很有幫助。黎澍同志在關於中國資本主義萌芽問題的考察一文中,作過這樣的論斷:“行會制度是與資本主義經營相反對的制度,只有在資本主義發展的時期,才可能被突破,並使得在它控制下的手工工場成为資本主義的。”按照他的這個論斷,那末,在行會制度尚普遍存在的清代的手工業生產中就談不到資本主義因素萌芽的問題了。我們認为這種見解是不妥當的;因此,有必要展開對這一問題
These inscriptions are recorded in the Qing Dynasty to the eve of the Opium War, Suzhou handicraft guild situation. Including the wax candle industry, the gold industry, paper industry, the number of paint jobs a few offices of the information. These materials provide important clues for the study of the nature of the handicrafts in Qing Dynasty. What is the nature of the handicrafts trade in Qing Dynasty? The answer to this question is very helpful for the research on the staging of the buds of capitalism in China. In his article on the germination of capitalism in China, Comrade Li Shu made the following statement: “The guild system is the opposite of capitalist management and can only be broken up during the development of capitalism So that the handicraft factory under its control becomes capitalist. ”According to this assertion, there was no question of the germination of capitalism in the Qing-style handicraft production, where the guild system is still prevalent. We think such an opinion is inappropriate; therefore, it is necessary to start this issue