论文部分内容阅读
传统的法律解释方法奉行“主客二分”的观念,过于拘泥于文本而排斥任何主观价值的参与,这显然是对法律解释目标的误读。随着法律的语用学转向,语境在法律解释中的作用越来越重要与明显。语境起到释义与制约的功能,在法律解释中运用语境有助于实现事实与规范的良性互动。司法裁判中,法官在进行法律解释时需要结合语境,准确适用法律。
The traditional method of legal interpretation pursues the concept of “subject and object dichotomy”. It is obviously a misreading of the goal of legal interpretation that it is too rigidly adhered to the text to exclude any subjective value. With the pragmatic shift of law, the role of context in legal interpretation is more and more important and obvious. Context plays the function of paraphrase and restriction, and the use of context in legal interpretation helps to realize the benign interaction between fact and norm. In judicial adjudication, the judges need to combine the contexts and apply the law accurately in their interpretation of the law.