论文部分内容阅读
随着我国市场经济体制改革的不断深入,城镇居民主要通过市场购买的方式获取住房,近年来住房消费市场空前膨胀,住房价格居高不下,居民住房负担明显加剧。以衡量居民生活负担动态变化为重要目标之一的价格统计指标——居民消费价格指数(CPI),由于无法真实反映住房价格变化对居民生活的影响,其数据的准确性和真实性受到社会公众、学者,乃至有关决策部门的广泛质疑,要求CPI统计科学反映住房价格影响的呼声日益高涨。尽管官方统计部门多次声明,按照SNA核算要求居民购买住房视作投资而非消费,住房价格纳入CPI统计将失去与世界其他各国的可比性。然而,官方的声明并未平
With the continuous deepening of China’s market economy system reform, urban residents acquire housing mainly through market purchases. In recent years, the housing consumer market has been expanding at an unprecedented rate. Housing prices have remained high, and the housing burden on residents has increased markedly. To measure the dynamic changes in living burden of residents as one of the important goals of the price of the statistical indicators - consumer price index (CPI), because they can not truly reflect the changes in housing prices on the lives of residents, the accuracy of their data and authenticity by the public , Scholars, and even the relevant decision-making departments widely questioned the call CPI science of statistics to reflect the impact of housing prices growing. Although government statistics have repeatedly stated that housing purchases by residents as investment in the SNA accounting rather than consumption, housing prices will be included in the CPI statistics will be comparable with the rest of the world. However, the official statement is not flat