An Awesome Decade of Growth—and Fallacy

来源 :Beijing Review | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:udbnny
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
  China is rapidly approaching its once- in-a-decade change in president and government, which seems an appropriate time to survey the country’s economic performance over the last decade. As the economic data for 2012 is not yet in, the decade will be taken as 2001-11. Strictly speaking, this period includes a year of China’s previous administration; but this is merely a statistical quibble as nine 10ths of the period was overseen by the present government.
  Some statistics over that 10-year period are well-known: China became the world’s second largest economy and the world’s largest goods exporter. But such statistics greatly underestimate the scale of China’s economic achievement. The last 10 years in China’s economy may be summed up with two overwhelming facts which place all other economic data in context:
  l In the last decade China experienced the fastest growth in GDP per capita of any major economy in human history.
  l Translated into living standards, this means that in the last 10 years, China has experienced by far the fastest consumption growth rate of any major economy.
  These astonishing achievements are worth exploring in more detail.
  China’s annual average GDP per capita growth in the last 10-year period was 9.9 percent. The total increase in GDP per capita over the decade was 158 percent. Historically, as shown in World Bank data, and for earlier periods in Angus Maddison’s standard work World Population, GDP and GDP Per Capita 1-A.D. 2006, this makes China’s the fastest rate of increase ever recorded by a major economy. This figure is all the more extraordinary when one considers that it includes the period since 2008, which has seen the most serious international economic crisis in 80 years.
  In terms of contemporary economic comparisons, no other major economy remotely approaches China’s scale of economic growth during this 10 year period. The data for the largest G7 economies, the BRICS countries and South Korea, are set out in Table 1. China’s 158 percent increase in GDP per capita over the period is almost twice that of the next best performing major economy—India. In addition, China’s growth was two-and-a-half times Russia’s, more than three times South Korea’s, seven times Germany’s and 20 times the United States’.
  As a foundationless myth is peddled in some sections of the media that China’s economic growth has not translated into an increase in its population’s consumption, it is also useful to note the data for this. As all countries’ statistics for 2011 are not yet available, the period of 2000-10 will be taken. The total increase in China’s consumption per capita in that period was 103 percent—again the highest recorded by any major economy. The data is set out in Table 2. Only Russia’s increase in consumption compares to China’s—and Russia’s was, in significant part, due to its recovery from a long period of depression. China’s total rate of increase in consumption was 57 percent higher than India’s, three times South Korea’s, almost 10 times that of the United States, and almost 16 times that of Germany. In short, far from being slow, China’s consumption growth rate was far more rapid than that of any other major economy.
  This achievement also casts light on another issue—denial of elementary economic facts by those who regularly predicted that China’s economy would fail during this period. It would take too much space to make a comprehensive list, so here are some highlights.
  l Fallacy: The Economist magazine’s special supplement, “Out of Puff,” published in June 2002, claimed: “In the coming decade, therefore, China seems set to become more unstable. It will face growing unrest as unemployment mounts.” It went on to argue: “The [Chinese] economy still relies primarily on domestic engines of growth, which are sputtering. Growth over the last five years has relied heavily on massive government spending. As a result, the government’s debt is rising fast. Coupled with the banks’ bad loans and the state’s huge pension liabilities, this is a financial crisis in the making.”
  Reality: Instead of “crisis,” China experienced the most rapid growth ever in GDP per capita of any major economy.
  Fallacy: Gordon Chang predicted in The Coming Collapse of China in 2002, “A half-decade ago the leaders of the People’s Republic of China had real choices. Today they do not. They have no exit. They have run out of time.”
  Reality: Instead of “collapse” China experienced unprecedented economic growth.
  l Fallacy: When the international financial crisis erupted, Michael Pettis of Peking University in 2009 reiterated, “I continue to stand by my comment [made] last year ... that the United States would be the first major economy out of the crisis and China one of the last.”
  Reality: In fact, in the four years since the international financial crisis began, China’s economy has grown by 40 percent and the U.S. economy by 1 percent.
  Such statements, and many more like them, are not errors of predictions on details, which are inevitable; they are examples of analyses which simply got it wrong in predicting the entire trajectory of China’s economy. To predict “sputtering,” “crisis”or “collapse” when China experienced its remarkable growth, if rational standards of debate were used, should lead to the discounting of future prognostications based on these analyses. It is a measure of unscientific bias that Gordon Chang continues to be retained as a “China expert” by Forbes and that Michael Pettis is still printed in the Financial Times predicting 3 percent growth in China. Given their prolonged failure to withstand the test of facts, such views may be discounted.
  Do China’s quite extraordinary eco- nomic achievements mean that it is free from any problems? Evidently not, but it simply means that they must be placed in context. No other major country in human history has ever experienced such rapid economic growth as China in the last 10 years, and no other major economy has witnessed such a rapid growth in the population’s consumption in the last decade. These are truly awesome economic facts. Anyone who believes in rational fact based economic discussion has to register not only the scale of such an extraordinary achievement but also how completely it refuted the analyses of those predicting any deep crisis in China’s economy.
  Table 1: Increase in GDP Per Capita 2001-11
  
  Table 2: Increase in Total Consumption Per Capita 2000-10
其他文献
引言由天然气制备的吸热式气体的基本成份是:20%CO,40%H_2和40%N_2。英国氧气公司(BOC)用氮/甲醇合成的吸热式气氛的Endomix系统在资料[1.3]中已有了很好的说明。本质上,这种工
目的探讨大学生抑郁情绪与行为抑制特征的关系。方法采用Beck抑郁问卷、Zung氏抑郁自评问卷和行为抑制量表对大学生抑郁情绪组和正常对照组进行测查,比较2组在行为抑制量表得
气体氮化法虽然具备其它许多氮化方法所没有的优点,但是由于它的效率低,工作环境差,氨气的臭味熏人,因此不受人们欢迎。针对以上缺点,我们花了两年的时间从炉子结构上进行改
近十年来,世界上电弧炉炼钢的产量以每年大约5%的速度递增。电弧炉冶炼工艺的不断发展使得现代电弧炉能够提供最佳质量的产品,获得良好的经济效益。目前,降低操作费用、提高
1978年独立日早晨两点钟,我们知道了自己的工作得到了报偿。经过几百小时试验,我们最终找到成功地使用一种氮基气氛对钢进行碳氮共渗以硬化表面的必不可少的钥匙。当我们开
冷拉轴承钢(GCr15)的脱炭是个老大难问题,一直影响着轴承钢产量扩大和成材率提高,且经常发生脱炭退货。上钢五厂采用热轧材球化处理前增加浸硫酸处理的新工艺,以达到减薄热
温度是影响淬火变形的重要因素。调温法就是根据温度对变形影响的规律,而合理地调节淬火加热、冷却介质或热浴的温度,以减少工件的淬火变形。应用这种方法,在现有设备条件下
我厂设计制造的HQ8型多用打气筒,其中有个零件需要加工一道内筋(如图1所示)。对此,我们经过多次试验,总结了一套新的加工方法,即在普通车床上加装一套专用的活顶针装置(见图
我厂的锻模在使用时,经常出现裂纹、压塌、变形等缺陷。不但影响锻模的使用寿命,而且有时还出现废品。为了挽救这批报废的锻模,我们利用电弧焊方法补焊了几套已报废的模具。
作为重工业的代表产品——钢铁制品,除了有坚固、便宜的一面以外,还有重而厚的一面,这已被认为是钢铁制品的天性。但是,日本庄友金属工业公司的钢材加工厂家——井桁钢板厂