论文部分内容阅读
主流仲裁机构都已陆续增加了紧急仲裁制度,该制度具备在仲裁庭组成前为当事人提供临时救济的特质,完善了过去只有法院能在此阶段进行救济的情况。但紧急仲裁员不同于法院,其没有后者裁决与生俱来的强制力,所以紧急仲裁员裁决的执行效力是决定该制度成败的关键。通过研究发现,当前紧急仲裁临时裁决虽难以通过现有国际公约得到强制执行,但其通过国内法和合理的制度安排提高了自身的执行力。
The mainstream arbitration institutions have gradually increased the emergency arbitration system. The system has the qualities of providing interim relief to the parties before the arbitration tribunal is formed, and only the court can remedy the situation in the past. However, the emergency arbitrator is different from the court, and the latter does not have the inherent force of arbitration. Therefore, the effectiveness of the emergency arbitrator’s award is the key to determining the success or failure of the system. Through the research, it is found that although the current interim ruling of emergency arbitration is difficult to be enforced through the existing international conventions, it enhances its execution through domestic law and reasonable institutional arrangements.