论文部分内容阅读
[案情]今年,公司文员苏小妹参与了C公司在其官方网站上进行的抢购活动,C公司在其官方网站首页宣传:C牌M号唇膏,特价49元。苏小妹在C公司的官方网站上订购M号唇膏1个,实际结算价格为69元。后苏小妹诉至法院,以C公司对涉案商品的广告标价为49元,实卖69元,存在价格欺诈为由,请求法院判决C公司就价格欺诈行为赔偿苏小妹500元。法院审理认为,C公司在抢购前专门制作了宣传页面,即C牌M号唇膏特价49元,在抢购当日该广告仍然存在。由于网络
[Case] This year, the company clerk Su Xiaomei participated in the C company in its official website of the buying activities, C company in its official website home promotion: C license M lipstick, special 49 yuan. Su sister in the C’s official website to order M lip balm 1, the actual settlement price of 69 yuan. Su Xiaoxi sued the court to C companies on the goods involved in the advertising price of 49 yuan, the actual sale of 69 yuan, the existence of price fraud on the grounds that the court ruling on the price of fraud C Company Su Xiaomei 500. The court held that C company specially produced a promotional page before buying, that is, C brand M lipstick special 49 yuan, on the date of purchase the ad still exists. Thanks to the internet