论文部分内容阅读
参照《期刊与学术会议摘要中报告随机对照试验的CONSORT声明》拟定的报告清单,审核了国内4种重要期刊2005—2008年随机对照试验(RCT)英文摘要的报道质量。利用PubMed共查到108篇RCT摘要。经审核报道最好的项目是目的和结论,试验状态、分组例数和干预次之。对RCT执行质量的关键信息描述最差:盲法、随机分组方法和数据分析例数的报道分别为0、1.9%和6.5%。结果表明,RCT摘要报道普遍不完整。建议医学期刊采纳《摘要CONSORT》,制订可行的模板以提高RCT摘要报道的完整性和有效性。
According to the list of reports prepared by the CONSORT Statement of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Abstract of Journals and Symposia, the quality of the articles in the English abstracts of the four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in 2005-2008 in four domestic journals was examined. A total of 108 RCT abstracts were found using PubMed. The best reported items are the purpose and conclusion, the state of the experiment, the number of subgroups and the second is the intervention. The key messages describing the quality of RCT implementation were worst described: blinding, randomization, and data analysis were reported as 0, 1.9% and 6.5%, respectively. The results show that RCT abstract reports are generally incomplete. It is recommended that medical journals adopt “Summary CONSORT” to develop workable templates to improve the integrity and validity of RCT abstracts.