论文部分内容阅读
目的:了解无保护会阴接生技术对分娩结局的影响。方法:随机选取66例足月初产妇作研究组,实施无保护会阴接生技术分娩;另选取66例足月初产妇作对照组,实施传统会阴保护分娩法,对比两组初产妇各自分娩结局。结果:研究组、对照组初产妇会阴侧切率分别为3.03%、15.15%,组间比较差异显著(P<0.05);且研究组初产妇分娩时会阴损伤程度,分娩后新生儿Apgar评分情况均优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:无保护会阴接生技术能降低会阴侧切率,预防新生儿窒息,确保了母婴健康。
Objectives: To understand the impact of unprotected perineal delivery on childbirth outcomes. Methods: Sixty-six full-term primiparae were randomly selected as study group and unprotected perineal delivery technique was given. Another 66 full-term primiparous women were selected as the control group. The traditional perineal protective delivery method was compared with that of the two groups. Results: The rate of perineum episiotomy was 3.03% and 15.15% respectively in the study group and the control group (P <0.05). The incidence of perineal injury in primipara at the time of delivery and Apgar score of the newborn after delivery were Better than the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Unprotected perineal intercourse technique can reduce the perineal lateral incision rate, prevent neonatal asphyxia and ensure maternal and infant health.