评论界对卡夫卡的《城堡》有很多解释,没有确切的定论。只有把它看成是一个总体象征结构,小说才可能获得真正的解释。只有在这个整体象征结构中我们才能获得小说的寓意。城堡既是一个实体的存在,又是一个虚无的幻象,在《城堡》理解史中的歧义性,很大程度上是由于“城堡”的不确定性带来的。不同的解释者从不同的立场和文化背景出发读出了不同的含义,而最终没有人真正知道城堡到底为何物。这体现了卡夫卡思想的深度和对现实的深刻理解。 Critics have a lot of explanation about Kafka’s “castle”, there is no conclusive conclusion. Only think of it as an overall symbolic structure, the novel may be able to get a real explanation. Only in this overall symbolic structure can we get the moral of the novel. The castle is not only an entity, but also an illusion of nothing. Understanding the ambiguity in the history of the castle is due in large part to the uncertainty of “castle ”. Different interpreters read out different meanings from different standpoints and cultural backgrounds, and ultimately no one really knows what the castle really is. This shows the depth of Kafka’s thought and its profound understanding of reality.