论文部分内容阅读
引人关注的湖南省临湘市原副市长余斌涉嫌受贿一案,最终尘埃落定:岳阳市中级人民法院维持了一审法院作出的“余斌犯受贿罪,判处有期徒刑3年,缓刑5年,并处没收财产6万元”的判决。从两审法院的判决,余斌受贿罪罪名成立无疑,但这样一个事实清楚的受贿案,为何招来众人关注,甚至引得诸多“同情”?余斌本人也不认为自己有罪:他始终辩称“自己不挥霍就不是贪官”,“我的这些做法,从形式上讲,的确是在受贿,但我没有自己占有,所以并不构成受贿罪”。受贿所得用于扶贫等公务活动不构成犯罪,并自称是“借富济贫”。他甚至还认为,自己是采
Concerned about the original Vice Mayor of Linxiang City, Hunan Province, suspected of accepting bribes Yu Bin case, and finally settled: Yueyang Intermediate People's Court upheld the court of first instance made “Yu Bin guilty of accepting bribes, sentenced to 3 years imprisonment, suspended 5 Year, and confiscation of property 60,000 yuan ”verdict. From the trial of the court of second instance, Yu Bin was no doubt guilty of accepting bribes. However, why such a case of bribery with clear facts attracted so many people's attention and even attracted so many “sympathies”? Yu Bin himself did not consider himself guilty: he always argued that “ I do not squander is not a corrupt official, ”“ My practice, formally speaking, is indeed taking bribes, but I do not own, so it does not constitute a bribe. ” The proceeds of bribes used for poverty alleviation and other public activities do not constitute a crime, and claiming to be “borrowing and enriching the poor.” He even thought that he was mining