去年在某高科技园区演讲,谈到创新似乎引发了不少的争议,对于什么才是真正意义上的创新大家有不同的看法,以商业背景为主的风险投资者关注有没有新颖的盈利模式,以科研背景为主的创业者则多以科技领先性为创新的标识,而在公务员体制内的园区管委会往往只能用“专利”这个相对客观的指标来考量园区内的企业,在意识上似乎已将“专利”与创新等同了起来。其实高科技园区的主旨是通过扶植创新企业将科技转换为生产力。这其中“专利”或“高”科技本身并不等同于创新,尤其是具有商业意义的创新。 Speaking at a high-tech park last year, when it comes to innovation, it seems that there has been a lot of controversy over the debate. What is really innovation is that everyone has a different view. Venture capitalists based on business background are concerned about whether there are any new profit models , The majority of entrepreneurs with scientific research backgrounds are mostly identified with innovation in science and technology, and the park management committee within the civil service often can only consider enterprises in the park with the relatively objective index of “patent” , Seems to have equated “patent” with innovation in consciousness. In fact, the essence of the Hi-Tech Park is to transform science and technology into productive forces by fostering innovative enterprises. Among them, “patent” or “high” technology itself is not the same as innovation, especially with commercial significance.