目次一、媒体回应权:意义及辨析二、比较法上的媒体回应权三、中国的回应权立法:现状与对策中国人格权立法如果要对传统大陆法系国家立法模式进行突破,不仅要在法哲学层面对人格权法律关系予以理论解说,还应在实证层面对人格权的独特性予以重新廓清。其中,将人格权救济手段与侵权责任救济手段相区分是展现人格权独立性的重要步骤。人格权作为一种重在表彰自然人精神利益的权利类型,在很多情况下,其权利维持或遭受侵害脱离于 First, the media right to respond: the meaning and discrimination Second, the comparative law of the media right to respond Third, China’s right to respond to legislation: the status quo and countermeasures China’s right to personality legislation If the traditional continental legal system to break through the legislative model, not only in In the legal philosophical level, the legal relation of personality right should be explained theoretically. At the empirical level, the uniqueness of personality right should be re-clarified. Among them, it is an important step to demonstrate the independence of personality right by distinguishing between the means of relief of personality right and the means of remedy of tort liability. As a type of right focused on the spiritual interests of natural persons, the right to personality is, in many cases, maintained or infringed upon by its rights