在马克思思想的生成与创制过程中.施蒂纳的出现与影响似乎最为短暂.甚至几乎可以说是转瞬即逝的。在《惟一者及其所有物》之前,施蒂纳基本上默默无闻;而在《德意志意识形态》之后,其显赫于一时的声名又戛然而止,复归于沉寂。仿佛一颗划过天际的流星,在极为短暂的闪烁之际.便已湮没到沉沉的夜幕中去了。于是.在这种情况下,施蒂纳的出现与意义就被看得几乎纯粹是偶然的了,仿佛这一角色即便不是完全多余的,也仍然是无关紧要的。这样一来,马克思对施蒂纳的批判——特别是 In the process of the formation and creation of Marxist thought, Stina seems to be the most transient and almost ephemeral. Before “the only person and her belongings”, Stirner was largely obscure; after the “German ideology,” her illustrious momentary halt and reverted to silence. As if a meteor across the sky, in the very short flashing occasion, it has been annihilated into the heavy night gone. Thus, in this case, the appearance and meaning of Stirling is seen as almost purely accidental, as if the role, if not completely superfluous, remains irrelevant. As a result, Marx’s criticism of Stirner - especially