对于萨特的自由形象说,人们历来极少论及.最重要的原因在于,萨特把人物形象当成了哲学阐释的工具,形象理论似乎也由于附丽于哲学而失去了独立考察的意义.诚然,萨特这样说过:“一种小说技巧总是要追溯到小说家的形而上学,批评家的任务就是在估价前者之先限定后者.”但是这决不意味着萨特自由形象说在现代西方人物形象理论的发展中就无足轻重了.众所周知,在西方现代主义文艺运动中,哲学、心理学对文艺的直接渗透本是十分普遍的现象,一种思想体系如果具有创新意义,那么当它被用于解决文艺问题时,就必然会对传统文艺观念带来冲击与变更,’而理论的递变又影响 For Sartre’s free imagery, people have always said very rarely.The most important reason is that Sartre regarded the figure as a tool of philosophical interpretation, and the theory of image seems to lose the significance of independent investigation due to attachment to philosophy. , Sartre said: “A fictional technique always goes back to the metaphysics of the novelist, whose task is to limit the latter before the former one evaluates it.” But this in no way implies that Sartre said in a modern It is well known that in the Western modernist literary movement, the direct infiltration of literature and art by philosophy and psychology is a very common phenomenon. If an ideological system is of innovative significance, When used to solve the literary and art problems, it will inevitably bring about the impact and change on the traditional literary and artistic conceptions, and the theory’s changing and influencing