论文部分内容阅读
恩格斯曾经指出:“绝对分明的和固定不变的界限是和进化论不相容的……除了‘非此即彼!’,又在适当的地方承认‘亦此亦彼!’”究竟什么是“非此即彼”和“亦此亦彼”?它们相互的关系如何?怎样真体的运用这两个概念?不弄清这一系列基本问题,要想深入探讨从猿到人过渡阶段的性质,显然是不可能的。我们认为“非此即彼”体现着事物的差异性,反映了事物具有质的相对稳定性。而“亦此亦彼”则体现着事物的同一性,反映着事物的变化发展,在一定条件下可以相互转化。“非此即彼”和“亦此亦彼”既对立又统一,相互补充,构成了对事物的完整的认识。
Engels once pointed out: “The absolutely distinct and immutable boundaries are incompatible with evolutionism ... except that ’they do not mean one another’, admitting in due course that ’what exactly is’ What are their relations with each other? What are the two concepts of the use of authenticity? Without a clear understanding of the series of basic questions, we must thoroughly study the nature of the transition from apes to humans Obviously impossible. We think ”non-equality“ reflects the difference of things and reflects the relative qualitative stability of things. And ”Yi Yi Yi also“ embodies the identity of things, reflecting the changes in the development of things, under certain conditions can be transformed into each other. Both ”non-equality“ and ”one -ness-of-purpose" both oppose and unite with each other to complement each other and constitute a complete understanding of things.