学期初,在首次班会上,四位主要班委,提出辞职请求,他们的理由是:“能力差,当不起”。他们究竟为何辞职?我带着这个疑团,找他们个别谈心,终于摸清了他们的真实思想:班委差事多,耽误功课,徒有虚名,毫无益处。班长还举了例子:有一位师生公认的、品学兼优的班干部,在今年高考中,仅以二分之差,落选了。有的同学对此议论说:“多了几张奖状顶啥用,少了二分误前程!”高考制度的恢复,利于人才的培养,这是毋庸置疑的。不过,近年来,高校在录取新生时,也存在着一些值得研究和改进的问题。例如,对无重大政历问题的考生,高考成绩成了是否录取的唯一依据。至于考生的一贯表现如何,似乎不必考虑。 At the beginning of the semester, at the first class meeting, the four main class committees put forward their resignation requests. Their reasons are: “Poor ability to afford.” Why did they resign? I took this mystery, to find their individual talk, and finally find out their true thoughts: more than the task force Xiong, delay homework, fame, there is no benefit. The squad leader also cites an example: There is a recognized teacher and student class teacher with good academic performance, in this year’s college entrance examination, only half the difference, losing the election. Some students on the discussion said: “More than a few top certificates with the certificate, with two points missed the future!” The restoration of college entrance examination system, which will benefit the cultivation of qualified personnel, it is beyond doubt. However, in recent years, there are some problems worthy of study and improvement when colleges and universities admit freshmen. For example, candidates who do not have major political issues, the college entrance examination scores become the only basis for admission. As for the usual performance of candidates, it seems that we do not have to consider.