论文部分内容阅读
大家都承认,孔子最早提出了“正名”问题,但是对孔子“正名”的性质和意义历来是有歧义的。有的哲学史家或思想史家总认为,孔子的“正名”只具有政治、伦理方面的内容,不具有名辩(逻辑)方面的意义,或者认为孔子只提出了正名的要求,没有提出过其它名辩方面的思想。有人则认为,像“举一反三”、“能近取譬”这样通俗化的名言,只是常识范围的举
Everyone acknowledges that Confucius first proposed the issue of “rectification of names,” but the nature and significance of “rectification of names” has always been ambiguous. Some philosophical historians or historians of thought always hold the view that Confucius’s “real name” has only political and ethical elements, does not have any dialectical (logical) significance, or that Confucius merely proposed the requirement of a proper name, and did not propose other names Defense theory. Some people think that, like “give top priority to one country or the other,” and “can take the analogy,” the popular saying goes beyond commonsense