行为人以非法占有为目的,与他人签订汽车租赁合同取得车辆后,谎称车辆时其所有,将车辆质押获得借款后逃逸。行为人前后两个行为是基于同一概括犯意实施的行为,应当以合同诈骗一罪论处,而犯罪数额应以前后两行为涉案金额中较高者确定。在租赁合同履行过程中产生非法占有之故意,不影响合同诈骗罪的认定。在这种连环诈骗案件中,被害人的范围可包括汽车出租方和质押合同的质押权人。 The perpetrator illegally acquired for the purpose, signed a car rental contract with others to obtain the vehicle, the vehicle lied to all its possession, the vehicle pledged to obtain loans after the escape. The two acts before and after the act are based on the same summary of the intentional implementation of the act, should be a contract fraud on the crime, and the amount of crime should be determined by the higher of the two involved. In the course of the performance of the lease contract, it will not affect the cognizance of the contract fraud. In such a chain fraud case, the scope of the victim may include car-lenders and pledgee pledges.